The fact is that our analogies dont make sense:

So, you are a criminal who seeks immense wealth, then you choose to back an ideology to do a revolution that overthrows private property and be the ‘all powerful leader’ of that country? Taking on all that responsibility and all the danger of continual attempts at your life, for the price of living modest?

Instead of just engaging in criminal activity and getting rich fast, or just gambling on stock market like many do — all the wealth without any of the responsibility o a revolution?

………………

On the other hand, the former large landowner who had the people working for dimes, starving, is not a criminal — by the virtue of the property ownership, it is ‘okay’ for him to starve his villagers. If the villagers dont want to starve, they can just choose to go and work for another large landowner who will give them a little more starvation wages.

That’s totally ‘okay’.

………………

You rationalize the slow, sociopathic, cold hearted killing of people for profit, and then criminalize overthrow of such social contract.